ArticleNursing research and practice2026
The Journey Towards Withdrawal: Nurses' Experiences of End-of-Life Decisions in Cardiothoracic Intensive Care.
Article in Nursing research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: End-of-life (EOL) decision-making in intensive care units (ICUs) is ethically demanding. Nurses are often excluded from this process despite their continuous bedside presence. Surgical units, particularly cardiothoracic ICUs, are described as more inclined to pursue aggressive treatment, yet little is known about how nurses in these specialised settings experience EOL decision-making. Aim: The study aimed to illuminate how nurses in the cardiothoracic ICU experience EOL decision-making and the withdrawal of intensive care. Methods: A qualitative descriptive design was used. Twelve nurses from six cardiothoracic ICUs in Sweden were recruited through purposive sampling. Data were collected through digital semistructured interviews. An inductive content analysis following Elo and Kyngäs guided the analytic process. Results: Four categories captured the nurses' experiences. Decision-making as a winding road described the diverse and challenging nature of the decision-making process. Endeavouring to be a part of the team reflected the importance of teamwork and the nurses' inconsistent inclusion in EOL discussions. Facing ethical quandaries: Navigating doing good and doing no harm highlighted the ethical tensions inherent in intensive care. Caring beyond the patient: The crucial role of supporting relatives underscored the difficulties faced by relatives and the nurses' commitment to caring for them. Conclusion: Cardiothoracic ICU nurses navigate significant ethical challenges during EOL decision-making and emphasise the need for greater inclusion to strengthen advocacy. While several findings align with research from general ICUs, this study provides a context-specific account of how EOL decision-making is navigated in cardiothoracic intensive care. Persistent challenges related to nurses' involvement and interprofessional communication highlight the need for strategies to support nurse inclusion in EOL decision-making, as nurses' contributions may strengthen patient advocacy and care for relatives during EOL transitions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.