ReviewThe Analyst2026
Longitudinal live-cell chemical imaging using coherent Raman scattering microscopy.
Review in The Analyst, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optical methods enable minimally invasive analysis of chemical distributions and dynamics in biological specimens. Many optical imaging modalities have been developed to generate chemical contrast based on intrinsic molecular signatures or highly specific labeling. Coherent Raman scattering (CRS) microscopy has emerged as a powerful label-free technique for imaging biomolecules or exogenous compounds in biological samples. Most CRS imaging studies have focused on extracting chemical distribution, composition, and abundance in samples, and work in these areas has been extensively reviewed. However, an important aspect of chemical processes-the dynamics of chemical changes over time-has received less emphasis in CRS microscopy. Many critical insights into chemical processes lie in the spatiotemporal evolution of molecular species in live samples. Such information can only be obtained through live-cell imaging, and more importantly, longitudinal imaging of the same sample over time. In this review, we focus on key parameters related to longitudinal live-cell CRS microscopy and major recent studies. We first discuss three primary factors that must be considered for longitudinal CRS imaging: limit of detection, chemical selectivity, and phototoxicity. Limit of detection and chemical selectivity determine what CRS can measure, whereas phototoxicity dictates whether longitudinal imaging can capture meaningful cellular chemical dynamics with minimal perturbation to biological functions. In these discussions, we also provide critical comparisons between CRS microscopy and fluorescence microscopy. We then review recent developments and achievements in longitudinal CRS microscopy. Finally, we provide perspectives on future directions and areas where longitudinal CRS microscopy can make contributions to advancing our understanding of biological processes.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.