ArticlePain research & management2026
Spatial Organization of Acupoint Selection Across Pain Conditions.
Article in Pain research & management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spatial Organization of Acupoint Selection Across Pain Conditions.Pain research & management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acupuncture involves selecting acupoints distributed across the body, yet the spatial organization of this process remains unclear. Previous studies have identified frequently used acupoints across conditions but have paid limited attention to their spatial organization. Here, we analyzed patterns of acupoint selection across seven pain conditions, including episodic migraine, low back pain, dysmenorrhea, irritable bowel syndrome, carpal tunnel syndrome, osteoarthritis, and ankle sprain, using a dataset derived from randomized controlled trials. Acupoints were classified into six anatomical regions, and regional usage patterns were quantified and visualized. Acupoint selection showed two recurrent tendencies. Acupoints near the disease site were preferentially selected, reflecting region-specific recruitment. In contrast, distal extremity points were repeatedly used across conditions, with the lower-limb tendency being most evident in head/trunk conditions, reflecting cross-regional recruitment. Across the seven included conditions, distal extremity regions emerged as recurrent cross-regional components of acupoint selection. This region-level perspective complements point-frequency analyses by showing how acupoint selection is organized across the body.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.