ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2026
Deep Learning-Based Quantification of Spontaneous Pain Behaviours in Mice.
Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep Learning-Based Quantification of Spontaneous Pain Behaviours in Mice.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate evaluation of pain-related behaviours in rodent models is crucial for elucidating pain mechanisms and assessing the efficacy of novel analgesic compounds. Traditional nociceptive assays primarily measure evoked responses, which have limited translational relevance since spontaneous pain is the predominant symptom in pain patients. Rodent models of spontaneous pain reveal innate behaviours, including paw licking and flinching, but their manual quantification is often subject to observer bias, is error-prone and labor-intensive.
methodsWe have developed a deep-learning-based algorithm designed to automatically detect and quantify spontaneous pain behaviours in mice from standard 2D bottom-up video recordings. Focusing on paw licking and flinching in the capsaicin pain model, and validated in the formalin test and a model of cancer-evoked pain, our approach provides an objective, high-throughput and reproducible alternative to traditional manual scoring.
resultsThe pipeline, combining DeepLabCut-based keypoint tracking with a transformer classifier, achieved 92% balanced accuracy in identifying licking, flinching and baseline behaviours in the capsaicin model. Automated quantification showed an excellent correlation with expert human annotations (Pearson's r = 0.99), while frame-by-frame comparisons with blinded observers showed high agreement and minimal bias. Performance was maintained on an independently generated external dataset (Pearson's r = 0.98), supporting reproducibility across experimental settings. Validation in inflammatory and cancer pain models further demonstrated robust generalizability across distinct pathological conditions.
conclusionBy reducing observer-dependent variability and capturing subtle temporal and spatial dynamics, this framework provides a standardized and accessible tool for the objective assessment of ongoing nociceptive responses, facilitating comparisons across distinct experimental models and institutional settings. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Our findings highlight the potential of deep learning to advance preclinical pain research by enabling standardized, unbiased and clinically relevant assessment of spontaneous pain in rodent models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.