Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42775500›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2026

Deep Learning-Based Quantification of Spontaneous Pain Behaviours in Mice.

Michele Zanoletti, Elisa Bellantoni, Lídia Pombo Gomes, Maria Luiza Quadros Dos Santos, Daniel Souza Monteiro de Araújo, Gaetano De Siena, Sabrina Qader Kudsi, Romina Nassini, Marco Laurino, Francesco De Logu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Deep Learning-Based Quantification of Spontaneous Pain Behaviours in Mice.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michele ZanolettiInstitute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.
Elisa BellantoniDepartment of Health Sciences Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Lídia Pombo GomesGraduate Program of Neurosciences, Institute of Biology, Fluminense Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Niteroi, Brazil.
Maria Luiza Quadros Dos SantosGraduate Program of Neurosciences, Institute of Biology, Fluminense Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Niteroi, Brazil.
Daniel Souza Monteiro de AraújoGraduate Program of Neurosciences, Institute of Biology, Fluminense Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Niteroi, Brazil.
Gaetano De SienaDepartment of Health Sciences Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Sabrina Qader KudsiGraduate Program in Pharmacology, Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Romina NassiniDepartment of Health Sciences Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9223-8395
Marco LaurinoInstitute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.
Francesco De LoguDepartment of Health Sciences Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate evaluation of pain-related behaviours in rodent models is crucial for elucidating pain mechanisms and assessing the efficacy of novel analgesic compounds. Traditional nociceptive assays primarily measure evoked responses, which have limited translational relevance since spontaneous pain is the predominant symptom in pain patients. Rodent models of spontaneous pain reveal innate behaviours, including paw licking and flinching, but their manual quantification is often subject to observer bias, is error-prone and labor-intensive.

methodsWe have developed a deep-learning-based algorithm designed to automatically detect and quantify spontaneous pain behaviours in mice from standard 2D bottom-up video recordings. Focusing on paw licking and flinching in the capsaicin pain model, and validated in the formalin test and a model of cancer-evoked pain, our approach provides an objective, high-throughput and reproducible alternative to traditional manual scoring.

resultsThe pipeline, combining DeepLabCut-based keypoint tracking with a transformer classifier, achieved 92% balanced accuracy in identifying licking, flinching and baseline behaviours in the capsaicin model. Automated quantification showed an excellent correlation with expert human annotations (Pearson's r = 0.99), while frame-by-frame comparisons with blinded observers showed high agreement and minimal bias. Performance was maintained on an independently generated external dataset (Pearson's r = 0.98), supporting reproducibility across experimental settings. Validation in inflammatory and cancer pain models further demonstrated robust generalizability across distinct pathological conditions.

conclusionBy reducing observer-dependent variability and capturing subtle temporal and spatial dynamics, this framework provides a standardized and accessible tool for the objective assessment of ongoing nociceptive responses, facilitating comparisons across distinct experimental models and institutional settings. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Our findings highlight the potential of deep learning to advance preclinical pain research by enabling standardized, unbiased and clinically relevant assessment of spontaneous pain in rodent models.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalDeep LearningPainPain MeasurementAnimalsCapsaicinDisease Models, AnimalMaleMiceVideo RecordingCapsaicin

Identifiers

PMID42775500
PMCPMC13598732

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.