SynthesisMaternal & child nutrition2026
Community-Based Interventions for Childhood Undernutrition in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Maternal & child nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Childhood undernutrition remains a major public health challenge in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), despite global progress. This review evaluated the effectiveness of community-based interventions for treating undernutrition among children aged 6-59 months in SSA. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception to August 2024, without language restrictions. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster RCTs evaluating community-based nutrition-specific or nutrition-sensitive interventions were included. Primary outcomes were weight gain, height/length gain, and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC). Secondary outcomes were recovery, mortality, and micronutrient status. Forty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Interventions included therapeutic and supplementary feeding, dietary and micronutrient supplementation, disease management, breastfeeding and complementary feeding, and multisectoral approaches. Across the evidence base, nutrition-specific therapeutic feeding interventions, particularly lipid-based nutrient supplements (LNS), ready-to-use therapeutic foods (RUTF), and ready-to-use supplementary foods (RUSF), were most consistently associated with improvements in weight gain, MUAC, and recovery. Height gains were observed less consistently, and micronutrient outcomes were infrequently reported. Four comparable studies were eligible for a network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing LNS, corn-soy blend (CSB), and controls. Within this limited evidence network, LNS was associated with greater short-term improvements than controls in weight (+174 g; 95% CI 121-227), height (+0.32 cm; 0.04-0.60), and MUAC (+0.12 cm; 0.05-0.19), and with greater improvements than CSB in weight (+90 g; 29-150) and MUAC (+0.11 cm; 0.06-0.17) (moderate-certainty evidence). Community-based nutrition interventions improve anthropometric outcomes among undernourished children in SSA. Although the NMA suggested a potential benefit of LNS over CSB and controls for short-term anthropometric outcomes, the evidence was limited to four studies. Standardised outcome reporting and longer-term evaluations are needed to strengthen the evidence base and inform context-specific intervention design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.