Observational studyBrazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery2026
Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 Scores as Predictors of Mortality in Cardiac Surgery.
Observational study in Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAcute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II is an effective tool to predict outcomes in cardiac surgery recovery. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and compare the performance of the APACHE II and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS 3) scoring tools as predictive indices of mortality in cardiac surgery patients.
methodsThis was a retrospective observational study, evaluating patients over 18 years of age who underwent cardiac surgeries between 2020 and 2023. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the APACHE II and SAPS 3 tools in detecting intensive care unit (ICU) mortality in critically ill patients. Binary logistic regression was performed to assess the odds of mortality between groups (primary outcome) using data on comorbidities.
resultsAPACHE II was efficient in predicting mortality in cardiac surgery (sensitivity = 81%; specificity = 75%) as was SAPS 3 (sensitivity = 75%; specificity = 64%). Binary logistic regression revealed that mortality was significantly associated with comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease) and the type of surgery, with a higher risk in emergency procedures compared to elective ones.
conclusionIn conclusion, APACHE II and SAPS 3 proved to be efficient tools for predicting mortality in cardiac surgery patients admitted to the ICU. This study contributes to understanding these tools in a regional context and specifically in cardiac surgeries, as well as assessing other predictors that may be important for idenjpgying risk groups and predicting mortality after cardiac surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.