ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
The Fontan Choir: Singing for Single Ventricle Health and Wellbeing Feasibility Study.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children with Fontan circulation (FC) rely on passive blood flow to the lungs and require optimal lung function [1, 2]. Singing has been shown to increase exercise capacity, improve lung function and enhance quality of life (QoL) in adults and in rare studies of children with non-cardiac disease [7-9]. Singing as an intervention has not been studied in children with FC. A feasibility program of in-person and online singing and breathing instruction was developed and trialed by the Bienen School of Music and the Heart Center of the Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago. Pre- and post-intervention measures of exercise capacity, respiratory muscle strength, and QoL assessments were conducted before and after 8 weeks of singing instruction. This study provided 30 min of private voice instruction and 60 min of group instruction/week for eight weeks. In-person instruction was supported by an asynchronous on-line program of singing and breathing exercises performed independently several days per week between in-person sessions. The program was safe and feasible. 14 children aged 8-16 years completed the study with an 89% attendance rate and 27.5% homework completion rate. Post-intervention assessments demonstrated improvements in 3 breathing measures (single breath counting, sustained ah, and Twinkle Twinkle task) p < 0.005. Improvements occurred in patient self-report of depression (p < 0.05) and parent proxy reports of school function (p = 0.04), depression (p = 0.03) and anxiety (p = 0.02) and patient wellbeing p < 0.01. There was no improvement in spirometry or 6MWT. The program was well received by both children and parents. Our findings support the feasibility and acceptability of singing as an adjunct intervention for FC patients. Further investigation of these findings in a larger, longer trial is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42776237What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.