Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42776252›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2026

Prevalence of myopia and myopia trends among optometric telemedicine users in Spain: a retrospective nationwide observational study.

Elena Ros-Sánchez, David Oliver-Gutiérrez, Sara García-Hidalgo, Marc Tort Lacambra, Ignacio Flores-Moreno, Jorge Ruiz-Medrano, Miguel Ángel Zapata Victori

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elena Ros-SánchezDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain. elena.rs9@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2088-6294
David Oliver-GutiérrezDepartament de Cirurgia i Ciències Morfològiques, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0492-8645
Sara García-HidalgoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-7807-864X
Marc Tort LacambraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-7458-2633
Ignacio Flores-MorenoPuerta de Hierro University Hospital - Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4236-514X
Jorge Ruiz-MedranoPuerta de Hierro University Hospital - Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1105-9265
Miguel Ángel Zapata VictoriDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0096-4569

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the prevalence, severity, and temporal trends of myopia among patients attending optometric telemedicine screenings across Spain, and to describe age-specific distributions over time.

methodsThis retrospective, observational study analysed refractive data from 500,432 eyes of 269,868 patients evaluated at optometric centres nationwide in Spain within the UpRetina network between 2016 and 2024. Spherical equivalent (SE) values classified eyes into mild (SE ≤ - 0.50 D to - 3.00 D), moderate (-3.00 D to - 6.00 D), and high myopia (SE ≤ - 6.00 D). Both eyes were included when valid refractive data were available. Temporal trends were assessed by year and age. Descriptive and inferential statistics determined prevalence, SE distributions, and temporal changes.

resultsAmong 500,432 eyes analysed, 104,497 (20.9%) were myopic. Of these, 60.1% were mild, 30.3% moderate, and 14.1% high myopia. Mean SE values were - 1.57 D (SD 0.68) for mild, - 4.18 D (SD 0.84) for moderate, and - 8.58 D (SD 2.92) for high myopia. High myopia was most prevalent in adults aged 20-40 years (16.2-16.9%). Mild myopia predominated in the youngest (< 10 years) and oldest (> 70 years) age groups. Temporal trends in myopia prevalence and severity were analysed across the study period (2016-2024) and stratified by age groups, revealing a slight increase in mild myopia (55.2% to 58.9%), stability in moderate myopia (28.9% to 28.7%), and a gradual decrease in high myopia (15.9% to 12.4%).

conclusionsThis nationwide study provides an updated overview of myopia prevalence and severity in Spain, highlighting a substantial burden, particularly of high myopia among young adults. Telemedicine in optometric centres offers a potential efficient approach for population-based screening, enabling early detection and targeted public health strategies to manage myopia and its complications.

Indexed as

High myopiaMyopiaPrevalenceTelemedicine

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.