ArticlePoultry science2026
Effect of dietary chenodeoxycholic acid on fat deposition and intestinal health in Wenchang chickens.
Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), an endogenous agonist of the farnesoid X receptor, is involved in lipid homeostasis and intestinal barrier regulation. This study examined how dietary CDCA alleviates high-energy diet (HED)-induced metabolic disorders in Wenchang chickens and determined the optimal supplemental dose. A total of 525 Wenchang hens were randomly assigned to five groups: Con (basal diet), HED, and HED supplemented with 50, 100, or 200 mg/kg CDCA (≥ 98% purity). The experiment spanned 42 days. Compared with the control group, HED significantly increased abdominal fat percentage, serum LDL-C, and GLU levels (P < 0.05), reduced jejunal villus height by 35.05% and increased crypt depth by 35.44%, downregulated tight junction protein expression, activated the TLR-4/NF-κB pathway, and elevated serum LPS, DAO, and d-lactate levels (P < 0.05). The 50 and 100 mg/kg doses showed lesser effects, while 200 mg/kg was identified as the most effective dose. Compared to the HED group, 200 mg/kg CDCA supplementation significantly decreased abdominal fat by 41.7%, LDL-C by 40.53%, and GLU by 18.77% (P < 0.05). It enhanced lipolytic gene expression, suppressed adipogenic gene expression (P < 0.05), improved intestinal morphology (villus height increased by 36.60%, VH/CD by 53.79%), inhibited the TLR-4/NF-κB inflammatory pathway, and reduced harmful bacteria like Desulfovibrio, Helicobacter, and Bilophila (P < 0.05). Although the CDCA-supplemented groups had significantly less intramuscular fat content than the HED group, more than the control group (P < 0.05). In summary, dietary supplementation with 200 mg/kg CDCA effectively alleviates HED-induced lipogenesis and intestinal damage in female Wenchang chicken through regulation of lipid metabolism genes, restoration of intestinal barrier function, inhibition of the TLR-4/NF-κB inflammatory pathway, and modulation of gut microbiota composition, making it the ideal dose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.