ArticleBMJ open2026
What makes support groups effective and sustainable? an exploratory qualitative study of people living with HIV in the ICON-3 practice-based research network, Nigeria.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo explore how people living with HIV (PLHIV) perceive the factors that influence the effectiveness and long-term sustainability of HIV support groups in Nigeria.
designExploratory qualitative study using semi-structured focus group discussions (FGDs).
settingTwelve health facilities across Nigeria's six geopolitical zones, representing diverse urban and rural contexts affiliated with the Nigeria Implementation Science Alliance and ICON 3 Practice-Based Research Network (ICON-3 PBRN).
participants110 PLHIV, including support group members and leaders, participated in 12 FGDs. Participants were recruited purposively based on experience with support groups and HIV care.
methodsFGDs were conducted between March and May 2025, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. The psychosocial model of mental health guided inquiry and interpretation.
resultsSupport groups were perceived as transformative psychosocial and informational spaces that foster belonging, reduce isolation and enhance health literacy and treatment adherence. Key facilitators included vocational skill-building, cooperative income-generating activities and opportunities for economic self-sufficiency. Barriers included stigma and fear of disclosure, financial hardship (especially transport costs and loss of income), leadership instability, weak communication systems, inadequate infrastructure and breaches of confidentiality. Sustainability was linked to improved leadership, livelihood support, community awareness, reliable funding and multi-sectoral partnerships involving NGOs, philanthropists and health facilities.
conclusionsSupport groups in Nigeria function as critical psychosocial and economic support systems for PLHIV but remain constrained by structural, economic and stigma-related challenges. Strengthening their sustainability requires integrating psychosocial and livelihood interventions, improving governance structures and developing multisectoral collaborations. Findings provide context-specific direction for enhancing chronic illness support models in low-resource settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.