ReviewSignal transduction and targeted therapy2026
Cuproptosis and ferroptosis: signal pathways, diseases and therapeutic targets.
Review in Signal transduction and targeted therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regulated cell death is essential for tissue homeostasis, and its dysregulation contributes to numerous human diseases. Cuproptosis and ferroptosis are metal-dependent forms of regulated cell death distinguished by different biochemical triggers and pathological consequences. Cuproptosis arises from copper-mediated disruption and aggregation of lipoylated mitochondrial proteins, whereas ferroptosis is driven by iron-dependent phospholipid peroxidation. Despite these mechanistic differences, the two pathways intersect through mitochondrial metabolism, redox imbalance, iron-sulfur cluster biology, and organelle crosstalk. Lysosomes, mitochondria, and the endoplasmic reticulum act as critical regulatory hubs that influence cellular susceptibility to both death modalities. This review summarizes current understanding of the molecular mechanisms governing cuproptosis and ferroptosis. It examines the genetic, epigenetic, transcriptional, post-transcriptional, and protein-level networks that regulate these processes. Evidence linking cuproptosis and ferroptosis to cardiovascular, neurodegenerative, autoimmune, metabolic, oral, infectious, and neoplastic diseases is critically evaluated. Therapeutic approaches are discussed, including metal ionophores, chelators, small-molecule modulators, nanomedicine-based delivery systems, and rational combination strategies. Particular attention is given to the context-dependent consequences of activating or suppressing these pathways, and to the challenge of selectively targeting diseased tissues without disrupting systemic metal homeostasis. Successful clinical translation will require reliable biomarkers, mechanistically informed patient stratification, tissue-selective delivery, and a clearer understanding of interactions between metal metabolism, immune responses, and treatment resistance. The review further identifies unresolved questions concerning pathway specificity, temporal regulation, biomarker validation, and the clinical safety of systemic or prolonged therapeutic modulation. Integrating these concepts may enable more precise exploitation of cuproptosis and ferroptosis as therapeutic targets across diverse diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.