ArticleNPJ Parkinson's disease2026
Interaction- and asymmetry-aware facial blendshape analysis for objective quantification of Parkinsonian hypomimia.
Article in NPJ Parkinson's disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reduced facial expressivity (hypomimia) is an early motor feature of Parkinson's disease (PD), yet its assessment still relies on subjective, coarse-grained clinical scales. Using ExpressionTracker, a consumer-grade application built on Apple's ARKit framework, we derived 261 facial expression features during standardised cued expression tasks in 34 people with PD and 36 healthy controls (HC). Beyond the expected reduction in movement amplitude, PD was characterised by increased facial asymmetry and attenuated activity of ipsilateral mouth and eye regions. Interaction and asymmetry features were prominent among the between-group differences and explained 38 to 42 percent of the variance in clinician-rated hypomimia. For diagnostic classification (PD versus HC) under nested cross-validation, the best model (gradient boosting machine, GBM) reached an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.834 (95% CI 0.733 to 0.923), followed by XGBoost (0.810, 95% CI 0.702 to 0.906) and light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM; 0.804, 95% CI 0.697 to 0.899). Engineered ARKit features outperformed an amplitude-only baseline (maximum AUC 0.75, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.86) and a demographic confounder-only baseline using age and sex (maximum AUC 0.68, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.80). These results indicate that automated facial blendshape analysis captures multidimensional motor dysfunction beyond amplitude reduction alone, positioning ExpressionTracker as a candidate digital biomarker for community screening, disease monitoring, and drug-efficacy assessment in future clinical trials.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.