ArticleBrain and behavior2026
Understanding Multiple Intelligences Among Older Adults: Development and Validation of the Multiple Intelligence Scale for Older People.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies have supported a multidimensional view of intelligence, particularly the concept of multiple intelligence (MI). However, the application and comprehensive understanding of MI in the context of aging have been explored infrequently. The present study aimed to develop and validate the Multiple Intelligence Scale for Older People (MISFOP) for community-dwelling older adults, incorporating spiritual intelligence and ensuring cultural sensitivity through translation, adaptation, and psychometric validation.
methodsThe research comprised two studies to develop and validate the Chinese MISFOP. Study 1 involved translation and adaptation through expert review and pilot testing. Study 2 evaluated the 36-item instrument with 428 older adults using exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) and correlations with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).
resultsESEM resulted in a 29-item scale comprising an eight-factor structure, merging intrapersonal and spiritual intelligences due to theoretical insights and statistical considerations. The revised model showed excellent fit using the comparative fit index (CFI = 0.991), non-normed fit index (NNFI = 0.982), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA = 0.020), and standardized root mean square residual (SRMR = 0.017), with high internal consistency for the total scale (Cronbach's α = 0.91). Significant positive associations were found between MoCA scores and linguistic (β = 0.36, p < 0.001), logical-mathematical (β = 0.26, p = 0.007), and the combined intrapersonal/spiritual intelligence (β = 0.23, p = 0.001).
conclusionThe findings suggest associations between specific MI domains and cognitive health, indicating potential applications in geriatric care. Moreover, further research with larger, longitudinal samples across different cultural contexts is necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.