SynthesisF1000Research2026
Diagnostic Performance of Computed Tomography-Based Machine Learning Models in the Classification of Adnexal Masses - A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in F1000Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate characterization of adnexal masses is a key issue and a crucial step toward improving the outcome of managing a patient with a gynecologic oncology issue. Though ultrasound is a dominant tool for this process, it is subjected to operator variability and is less reliable from a diagnostic perspective. Advances in computed tomography-based radiomics and ML hold great promise as objective diagnostic solutions. Methods: This systematic review was performed according to the guidelines suggested by PRISMA. The literature research using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases included studies that examined CT-based radiomics and ML model performances for classification of adnexal masses and reported diagnostic performance metrics, including AUC, sensitivity, and specificity. Quality assessment of included studies was performed using the QUADAS 2 tool. Results: Eleven studies were included in the review. The performance of CT-based ML models was found to be moderate to excellent, with an AUC ranging from 0.72 to 0.99. Hybrid radiomics-DL algorithms were found to have a higher performance compared to other algorithms. The studies were found to have low risk of bias. Conclusion: CT-based radiomics and AI models also hold good prominence as adjunctive tools in differentiating between both benign and malignant adnexal masses and in predicting prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.