ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Simulated field potentials capture multiple simultaneous processes underlying human temporal attention.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Essential cognitive processes like attention, memory, and decision-making require the brain to perform many operations simultaneously. Disentangling the neural mechanisms underlying these processes is challenging because they often unfold concurrently with similar dynamics. In auditory temporal expectation, these mechanisms include the accumulation of incoming sensory information in the auditory cortex interacting with cortical signals biasing activity in anticipation of future stimuli. Here, we leverage invasive human field potential recordings from participants performing a subjective temporal expectation task. Rather than relying on traditional neuroimaging methods that average or transform neural responses, we instead simulate each trial's predicted field potential, based on known field potential physiology combined with components of established cognitive theories of the temporal expectation task: sensory input, top-down bias, and sensory anticipation. Our predicted field potentials strongly correlate with neural activity in auditory regions and in regions associated with auditory temporal perception, including the parietal, temporal, and prefrontal cortices. By differentiating individual cognitive mechanisms through simulation, we identify neural signatures of attentional bias and anticipatory sensory activity across multiple cortical regions that predict trial-by-trial perceptual accuracy and confidence.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.