ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Interactional organization of WeChat-based pediatric consultations in China: a mixed-methods study of caregiver-physician exchanges.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: WeChat group consultations extend pediatric advice into everyday messaging, but their interactional organization is not well described. Objective: To identify recurring interactional stages, and clarification practices in asynchronous caregiver-physician exchanges. Methods: We analyzed 5,938 messages nested within 347 manually identified complete consultation episodes from one private pediatric WeChat group in Chengdu, China, collected from January to December 2024. A qualitatively led mixed-methods design combined manual sequence segmentation, descriptive analysis of message distribution and length, and targeted qualitative analysis of clarification sequences. Results: Four recurrent stages were identified: problem initiation, clinical data collection, diagnostic advice, and closure. Opening and illness presentation were combined in 69.45% of episodes (241/347), and diagnosis with treatment recommendation in 85.88% (298/347). Caregivers produced more messages overall than physicians (3,273 vs. 2,665), with substantially longer and more variable messages during problem initiation (median = 9 vs. 3; M = 17.91 vs. 3.50; IQR = 14.75 vs. 3) and clinical data collection (median = 10 vs. 7; M = 14.22 vs. 9.29; IQR = 11 vs. 7). Message-length distributions became more comparable during diagnostic advice (median = 10 for both; IQR = 12 vs. 13). Clarification sequences were identified in both directions: 293 physician-led sequences during clinical data collection and 686 caregiver-initiated sequences during diagnostic advice, progressively transforming underspecified symptom reports into more specified clinical accounts. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate how asynchronous messaging redistributes communicative activities between caregivers and physicians, with clarification as a recurrent mechanism for specifying clinically relevant information. Structured symptom prompts, clearer message threading, and explicit escalation guidance warrant testing in future intervention research. This study provides an empirical basis for understanding the sequential organization of asynchronous pediatric consultations and offers actionable directions for communication design in digital health services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.