ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Inter-regional interactions uncouple within-region inhibition stabilization and paradoxical responses.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Paradoxical responses, in which excitatory perturbations of inhibitory neurons reduce their firing rates, are widely regarded as a hallmark of inhibition-stabilized networks (ISNs) and have been observed in multiple brain regions. However, because brain regions are interconnected by long-range projections, it remains unclear whether a paradoxical response observed in a given region reflects inhibition stabilization within that region or instead arises from distributed interactions among regions. Here, using analytically tractable multi-region population models and numerical simulations, we show that inter-regional connections can dissociate local inhibition stabilization from paradoxical responses. The condition for a paradoxical response in a given region is jointly determined by recurrent excitation within that region, feedback mediated through other regions, and the dynamics of those other regions. Consequently, inter-regional coupling can generate a paradoxical response in a region that is not locally inhibition-stabilized or abolish it in a region that is. Thus, in an interconnected network, a paradoxical response is neither necessary nor sufficient for local inhibition stabilization. These findings demonstrate that local perturbation responses cannot generally be interpreted solely in terms of local circuit dynamics and highlight the importance of accounting for inter-regional connections when inferring the local circuit properties of individual brain regions.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.