ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Transvaginal in-bag directional morcellation with endometrial preservation for large uteri: an initial clinical feasibility study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To explore the initial clinical feasibility and preliminary surgical safety of transvaginal four-wall directional in-bag morcellation for extracting exceedingly large uteri during laparoscopic total hysterectomy (TLH), aiming to preserve endometrial integrity as an anatomical barrier. Methods: This retrospective study included 25 patients with large uteri (12-18 gestational weeks) who underwent TLH. Following uterine detachment, a transvaginal isolation bag was inserted to establish a pneumo-bag. Under direct visualization, an electromechanical morcellator performed directional volume reduction on the four myometrial walls. The endometrial layer was strictly preserved. The intact central "core cavity" and morcellated fragments were then extracted en bloc within the bag. Results: All 25 surgeries succeeded without conversion to laparotomy. Mean uterine volume was 725.6 ± 215.4 cm Conclusions: Transvaginal directional in-bag morcellation appears to be a technically feasible and initially safe surgical option. By establishing a "dual barrier"-an intact endometrial cavity (anatomical) and a sealed bag (physical)-this novel technique shows potential in providing macroscopic physical containment. However, lacking cytological evaluation, long-term follow-up, and a comparative control group, its potential oncological safety benefits remain strictly theoretical at this preliminary stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.