Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42780455›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026

Comparative predictive performance of different eGFR equations for 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Yicheng Wang, Fangming Liu, Ruoxi Qi, Xiaohan Wang, Jiajie Mei, Zhenzhu Liu, Lijiao Zhang, Wenli Xie, Ming Yu, Xiaodong Zhang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yicheng Wang *Department of Cardiology and the Institute of Heart and Vascular Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Fangming Liu *Department of Cardiology and the Institute of Heart and Vascular Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Ruoxi QiDepartment of Mental Health and Psychology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Xiaohan WangCollege of Sports Medicines and Rehabilitation, Shandong First Medical University, Taian, Shandong, China.
Jiajie MeiDepartment of Cardiology and the Institute of Heart and Vascular Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Zhenzhu LiuDepartment of Cardiology and the Institute of Heart and Vascular Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Lijiao ZhangDepartment of Cardiology and the Institute of Heart and Vascular Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Wenli XieDepartment of Cardiology and the Institute of Heart and Vascular Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Ming YuDepartment of Cardiology and the Institute of Heart and Vascular Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Xiaodong ZhangDepartment of Cardiology and the Institute of Heart and Vascular Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Hongyan WangDepartment of Cardiology and the Institute of Heart and Vascular Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Zhaohong GengDepartment of Cardiology and the Institute of Heart and Vascular Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Renal dysfunction is an important determinant of cardiovascular prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is widely used to assess kidney function, but different equations may yield varying risk stratification results. This study aimed to compare the predictive performance of creatinine-based and cystatin C-based eGFR equations for 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: This retrospective study included 560 patients who underwent PCI for acute coronary syndrome. Baseline clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic variables were collected. Renal function was assessed using both creatinine-based and cystatin C-based eGFR equations. Logistic regression with backward selection based on the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) was performed to identify independent predictors of 1-year MACE. In addition, multiple machine learning models were developed to evaluate predictive performance, and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis was applied to assess feature importance. Results: During the 1-year follow-up, MACE occurred in 72 patients, comprising 71 repeat PCIs and one cardiac death. Equations relying on cystatin C detected a larger share of patients with impaired renal function compared with creatinine-based formulas. However, moderate-to-severe renal dysfunction defined by creatinine-based eGFR was significantly associated with an increased risk of 1-year MACE, although it was not retained as an independent predictor after AIC-based multivariable adjustment. Machine learning models demonstrated modest predictive performance overall, with logistic regression achieving the highest discriminative ability. SHAP analysis indicated that cardiovascular functional parameters and metabolic markers were the major contributors to risk prediction, while renal function indicators provided complementary prognostic information. Conclusions: Creatinine-based eGFR showed a stronger observed association with 1-year MACE after PCI than cystatin C-based eGFR in this single-center cohort; these findings do not establish clinical superiority of either equation and require external validation. Renal function assessment remains an important component of cardiovascular risk stratification, and traditional regression models performed comparably to machine learning approaches in moderately sized clinical datasets.

Indexed as

eGFRMACEmachine learningPCIprediction

Identifiers

PMID42780455
PMCPMC13597273

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.