ArticleHealth science reports2026
Knowledge of Blood-Borne Infections Among Secondary School Students in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Blood-borne infections remain a major global public health concern. Adolescents may encounter preventable exposure risks, making adequate knowledge of transmission and prevention important. This study assessed knowledge of blood-borne infections and associated sociodemographic factors and explored the association between previous exposure to health education and knowledge level among secondary school students in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Methods: An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among 686 students selected through multistage random sampling from four governmental secondary schools during the 2017-2018 academic year. Data were collected using a structured, self-administered, expert-reviewed questionnaire that demonstrated excellent internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.954). Descriptive analyses, Results: The response rate was 98%. Overall, 63.7% of participants had poor knowledge, 24.1% had moderate knowledge, and 12.2% had good knowledge. In bivariate analyses, knowledge level was significantly associated with gender, age, educational grade, educational track, and parental educational level. Previous exposure to health education was also significantly associated with knowledge level ( Implications for School Health Policy and Practice: The identified knowledge gaps may help inform age-appropriate and culturally relevant school health education programs addressing the transmission and prevention of blood-borne infections. Conclusion: Substantial knowledge gaps regarding blood-borne infections were identified among secondary school students. These findings provide baseline evidence for future research and school health education initiatives. Contemporary studies are needed to determine whether similar knowledge gaps persist among secondary school students in Saudi Arabia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.