ReviewRegenerative therapy2026
Platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of spinal cord injury: Mechanisms, efficacy, and clinical translation.
Review in Regenerative therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating condition of the central nervous system characterized by complex pathophysiological processes, including primary mechanical damage and secondary injury cascades, ultimately leading to permanent neurological deficits. Current standard treatments-including surgical decompression and high-dose methylprednisolone-offer limited therapeutic benefits and fail to effectively promote neuroregeneration. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), an autologous biological derivative enriched with multiple growth factors, has demonstrated remarkable potential in tissue repair and has recently emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy for SCI. This comprehensive review systematically examines the pathophysiological characteristics of SCI and the limitations of existing treatments, with particular emphasis on the multifaceted mechanisms of PRP in SCI repair. These mechanisms include anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects through activation of the Nrf2 signaling pathway, regulation of apoptosis, promotion of angiogenesis, and stimulation of axonal regeneration. Preclinical studies and preliminary clinical observations have consistently demonstrated that PRP administration significantly improves neurological functional recovery following SCI. However, substantial challenges impede clinical translation, including a lack of standardization in PRP preparation, an incomplete understanding of underlying mechanisms, limited efficacy of monotherapy, and a scarcity of high-quality clinical evidence. Future directions emphasize the development of combination strategies integrating PRP with biomaterials such as hydrogels or stem cells, which may represent the key to successful clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.