ArticleEngineering in life sciences2026
Synthetic promoters developed through a site-specific integration system enhance antibody expression in fed-batch culture.
Article in Engineering in life sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Constructing expression cell lines using site-specific integration (SSI) technology has become a prominent focus in cell line development (CLD) because of its potential to minimize clonal variation. However, this technology has not yet been widely adopted in commercial biopharmaceutical manufacturing. A major reason is the low yield of SSI-derived cell lines. To improve yield, we designed landing pad locus-specific synthetic promoters by screening for potent transcription factor regulatory elements (TFREs) within an SSI platform. We then combined these TFREs to create novel, strong promoters. All synthetic promoters exhibited reporter expression comparable to that of the CMV promoter, with some up to 20% stronger, despite being only one-third the length of the CMV promoter. When expressing a monospecific antibody, fed-batch titers from these synthetic promoters were up to 45% higher than those from the CMV promoter. We also used synthetic promoters to express a bispecific antibody via SSI. The titer from a pure synthetic promoter combination was ~2.7 g/L, lower than that from an all-CMV promoter combination (~3.8 g/L). These findings demonstrate that established SSI platforms can be used to design efficient context-specific promoters, leading to significant improvements in antibody expression and greatly enhancing the value of SSI applications in CLD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.