ReviewJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2026
On-demand therapies-emergency medication or daily routine?
Review in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluctuations represent a major therapeutic challenge in Parkinson's disease (PD) and become increasingly prevalent with disease progression. While oral and device-aided therapies (DAT) improve symptom control, patients continue to experience disabling OFF episodes, in particular early morning OFFs, delayed ON, and no-ON phenomena. Increasing evidence suggests that both motor and non-motor fluctuations are more common than previously recognized and contribute substantially to impaired quality of life. Fluctuations affect up to 50% of patients within five years of disease onset to eventually affect almost all patients with longer duration. Beside altered central pharmacodynamics, peripheral mechanisms such as dysphagia, gastroparesis, altered intestinal absorption, and microbiome-mediated levodopa degradation, contribute to fluctuations. Although oral adjunct medication and DAT reduce daily OFF-time, clinically meaningful OFF periods often persist. This is where on-demand therapies provide rapid symptom relief and address the limitations of conventional oral medication and DAT. Hence, more regular, even daily use of on-demand therapies may improve quality of life in patients with PD. However, the potential impact of on-demand therapies on non-motor OFF periods needs further investigation. Side effects, handling and economic considerations should be taken into account. This expert perspective concludes that given the high prevalence and clinical relevance of fluctuations, on-demand therapies may be considered as an integral component of standard PD management rather than solely as a rescue option in rare emergency situations. Implementation may be particularly beneficial for patients experiencing early-morning-OFFs, delayed and no-ONs but also predictable and unpredictable OFFs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42782352What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.