ReviewCells2026
Biological Insights into Intestinal Adaptation from Preclinical Models of Short Bowel Syndrome.
Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Short bowel syndrome is a rare and clinically heterogeneous condition resulting from extensive intestinal resections or functional impairment, leading to malabsorption, fluid and electrolyte losses, and potential progression to intestinal failure requiring long-term parenteral nutrition. The long-term outcome of SBS is largely determined by intestinal adaptation, a progressive physiological response involving epithelial remodeling, intestinal stem cell expansion, lineage-specific proliferation, vascular remodeling, and the activity of trophic mediators-most notably glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2)-whose clinical relevance is exemplified by teduglutide. Despite significant therapeutic advances, the mechanisms underlying adaptation remain incompletely understood, and preclinical models are essential tools for addressing this gap. In vitro systems-including Caco-2 epithelial cultures, intestinal organoids and enteroids, and tissue-engineered intestinal constructs-enable pathway-specific mechanistic investigation and hold promise as regenerative platforms. Murine surgical models of small bowel resection and ileocecal resection provide an integrated in vivo context for dissecting cellular and molecular mechanisms of adaptation. Large animal models, particularly minipig platforms, offer anatomical and physiological proximity to humans required for translational and therapeutic evaluation. In this narrative review, we provide an updated overview of these preclinical systems, critically examining their respective strengths, limitations, and translational relevance to advance the understanding of intestinal adaptation and inform the development of more effective therapeutic strategies for SBS (graphical abstract).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.