ArticleBiosensors2026
Design and Evaluation of Multi-Electrode Configurations for Transcutaneous Frontal Nerve Activation.
Article in Biosensors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional migraine treatments often come with undesirable side effects. One alternative approach uses a wearable neuromodulation device that stimulates nerves in the forehead. However, clinical studies have reported modest effectiveness, and some users experience discomfort or pain. These issues may be associated with electrode design, which can require higher stimulation currents to achieve activation. This study aims to evaluate the stimulation currents required by the migraine neuromodulator device and to explore whether modifying electrode arrangement can lower these current levels, which may potentially improve patient comfort and treatment compliance. To accomplish this, a hybrid computational framework combining a 3D volume conductor model with biophysical nerve dynamics was deployed. To capture population diversity, forty distinct nerve models were generated based on statistical variations in trajectory paths and evaluated across five electrode array configurations. The findings show that the proposed electrode array (EA) and neuroanatomical variability significantly influence stimulation thresholds. Simulations of the Cefaly electrode produced current thresholds ranging from 9 mA to 30 mA across the models. When the proposed EA was applied by aligning with nerve pathways, the required currents dropped substantially, ranging from 0.5 mA to 9 mA. Additionally, this design reduced calculated peak spatial current density across superficial tissue layers-a factor associated with cutaneous discomfort-which may support improved tolerance and long-term treatment adherence in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.