ReviewMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Targeting MicroRNA-21 in Chronic Kidney Disease: Lessons from the Lademirsen Story.
Review in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MicroRNA-21 (miR-21) has long been regarded as one of the most promising molecular targets in chronic kidney disease (CKD) because of its consistent upregulation across diverse renal disorders and its involvement in fibrosis, inflammation, oxidative stress, and metabolic dysfunction. Strong preclinical evidence demonstrated that inhibition of miR-21 reduced kidney injury, preserved renal function, and improved survival in multiple experimental models, particularly Alport syndrome, leading to the clinical development of the antisense oligonucleotide lademirsen. However, despite a compelling biological rationale and encouraging animal data, the phase 2 HERA trial failed to demonstrate a clinically meaningful effect on the rate of kidney function decline, resulting in discontinuation of the program. This review examines the biological functions of miR-21 in CKD, summarizes the experimental and clinical evidence that supported its therapeutic development, and critically analyzes the factors that may explain the discrepancy between preclinical success and clinical failure. Particular attention is given to the distinction between disease-associated biomarkers and true therapeutic drivers, the limitations of animal models, disease heterogeneity, timing of intervention, and the complex regulatory networks underlying progressive kidney fibrosis. Rather than representing the end of miR-21 research, the experience with lademirsen provides valuable insights into the challenges of translating RNA-based therapies into clinical practice. Future therapeutic strategies will likely require earlier intervention, improved patient selection, robust biomarkers of target engagement, and combination approaches that address the multifactorial nature of CKD. The lessons learned from the lademirsen program may help guide the development of the next generation of RNA therapeutics for kidney disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.