ArticleJournal of Intelligence2026
Second Language Learners' Cognitive Evaluation of GenAI Interactive Learning Experience: Scale Development and Network Analysis.
Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) becomes increasingly integrated into second language (L2) learning, there is a growing need for reliable instruments to assess learners' cognitive evaluation of GenAI-mediated interactive learning experiences. This study developed and validated the GenAI L2 Interactive Learning Experience Scale (AI-L2-ILES) among 1130 Chinese university students. Drawing on an interactive experience perspective and adapting it to L2 learning, the study conceptualized learners' cognitive evaluation of GenAI interaction as comprising five dimensions: Effectiveness, Sociability, Novelty, Flow, and Seamlessness. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported this five-factor structure, with satisfactory evidence of reliability, validity, and measurement invariance across gender and academic disciplines. Network analysis further revealed that Flow was the most central dimension, Sociability showed the strongest association with Effectiveness, and Novelty occupied a relatively peripheral position. The network structure was stable across academic disciplines. Overall, the AI-L2-ILES provides a psychometrically sound measure of learners' cognitive evaluation of GenAI-mediated interactive L2 learning experiences and captures five distinct but interconnected dimensions of this emerging construct. The scale offers a useful tool for examining how L2 learners cognitively evaluate their interactions with GenAI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.