ReviewMetabolites2026
Gut Microbial Metabolism as a Dynamic Interface in Neurodegenerative Diseases.
Review in Metabolites, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gut microbial metabolism links intestinal ecology with systemic physiology and neural pathology, but its effects vary across disease stage, tissue compartment, and host background. This review uses Alzheimer's disease (AD) as the principal model and compares selected features with Parkinson's disease (PD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Across the AD continuum, fermentation-related changes appear in prodromal cohorts, whereas broader alterations in amino acid products, host-microbial co-metabolites, bile acids, and lipids accompany mild cognitive impairment and dementia. These group-level patterns do not constitute a fixed patient trajectory. Microbial production, intestinal absorption, hepatic conversion, renal clearance, barrier integrity, and tissue-specific receptors jointly determine biological exposure. Experimental studies connect short-chain fatty acids and indole derivatives with epithelial and neuroimmune homeostasis, while imidazole propionate, trimethylamine N-oxide, selected kynurenine products, and remodeled bile acid pools engage vascular, inflammatory, amyloid, or tau-related pathways. Cerebral pathology can also remodel the intestinal ecosystem, creating reciprocal feedback. Apolipoprotein E4 modifies lipid handling, vascular permeability, and immune responses, helping to explain why comparable metabolic profiles may carry different consequences among individuals. Translation therefore requires more than a change in community composition. Trials must verify microbial function, metabolite target engagement, AD biomarker response, and clinical benefit in appropriately stratified participants. Shared pathways in PD and ALS provide comparison points, but disease-specific cells, proteinopathies, and treatment exposures constrain direct transfer of AD-derived targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.