ReviewTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2026
Multimodal Characterization of Atrial Fibrillation: From Patient-Specific Anatomy and Electrophysiology to Standardized Atrial Mapping.
Review in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This narrative review synthesizes a comprehensive multimodal characterization framework for atrial fibrillation (AF), tracing its progression from patient-specific anatomical reconstruction to electrophysiological phenotyping and standardized spatial mapping. The literature was identified through searches of PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, covering publications from January 2010 to June 2026, with additional studies identified from relevant references. Anatomical characterization leverages clinical imaging modalities alongside advanced deep learning models to execute precise whole-chamber, subregional, and tissue-level modeling. Electrophysiological profiling spans multi-scale modalities, including 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG), body surface potential mapping (BSPM), electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI), and electroanatomical mapping (EAM), complemented by wearable sensors for longitudinal rhythm surveillance. To bridge heterogeneous datasets across subjects and modalities, standardized coordinate systems and multimodal registration enable reproducible data integration. These integrated data parameterize patient-specific computational models to advance mechanistic insight, risk stratification, and personalized AF management. However, broad clinical translation remains constrained by imaging variability, reconstruction noise, registration uncertainty, and limited prospective multicenter validation. Future progress hinges on moving beyond technical accuracy toward prospective trials evaluating algorithm-guided clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.