ArticleEarly intervention in psychiatry2026
Redesigning a Fidelity Measurement Tool for Early Psychosis Services: Responding to Evolving Service Landscapes in Australia.
Article in Early intervention in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn Australia, early implementation of headspace Early Psychosis (hEP) services was supported by fidelity assessments using the Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centre (EPPIC) Model Integrity Tool (EMIT). Its suitability became limited by ceiling effects and limited sensitivity to evolving service contexts. This paper describes the redevelopment of EMIT into the Revised-EMIT (REMIT) and testing implementation of the tool.
methodsA multi-phase mixed-methods, human-centred design approach was used. Phases included reviewing international fidelity frameworks, stakeholder co-design and iterative redevelopment of fidelity items, scoring and data sources. Testing of the REMIT occurred over 2 years via face-to-face visits to hEP clusters, using semi-structured interviews, review of organisational documents and clinical file audits. Routine data reporting via Tableau embedded Learning Health System principles within the process. National fidelity trends across fidelity item outcomes for all six hEP service clusters were descriptively analysed.
resultsThe REMIT was found to reduce ceiling effects and improve sensitivity. National mean REMIT score increased from 3.99 (2023) to 4.19 (2024), with notable gains in caseload management, physical health monitoring and measuring key outcomes. Relational domains (such as continuous engagement and family involvement) remained persistently low across services and years.
conclusionThe REMIT offers a pragmatic, sensitive fidelity measure for contemporary hEP services. Findings support the use of REMIT as an active learning system rather than a static compliance mechanism. Psychometric evaluation of the tool is now required, and ongoing iterative refinement will be essential to maintain relevance within Australia's evolving youth mental health system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.