ArticleAddiction biology2026
Regulation of Craving: Neural Correlates and the Role of Stress and Delay Discounting.
Article in Addiction biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Regulation of craving (ROC) by focusing on long-term negative consequences of drug use has been shown to successfully reduce subjective craving. This process is supported by the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), which exerts control over reward and value signals in the ventral striatum (VS) and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). As stress impairs cognitive control and addiction is characterized by altered value computations manifesting in delay discounting, we examined how these factors interact with ROC and its neural correlates to better understand the use of ROC in high-risk situations. Sixty-eight male smokers underwent a delay discounting task and either a stress (socially evaluated cold pressor task) or a control condition. They subsequently completed a ROC task during fMRI while focusing on (1) long-term negative consequences (LATER) versus (2) short-term positive consequences (NOW). We found lower subjective craving ratings and attenuated neural responses in the VS (t = 4.33, p = 0.012) and vmPFC (t = 5.79, p < 0.001), as well as higher activation in the dlPFC (t = 4.09, p = 0.038) in the LATER compared to the NOW strategy. Although no neural or behavioural difference in ROC was observed between stress and control groups, both individual stress (cortisol) and delay discounting were positively related to vmPFC activity (NOW > LATER). We replicated previous results on ROC. Importantly, the association of vmPFC signals with stress response and delay discounting suggests that enhancing ROC success may involve reinforcing changes in self-referentiality of future thoughts to subjective value of drug use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.