ReviewClinical and translational medicine2026
Circulating tumour cells for guiding antibody‒drug conjugate therapy: Role of artificial intelligence.
Review in Clinical and translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Circulating tumour cells for guiding antibody‒drug conjugate therapy: Role of artificial intelligence.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antibody‒drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a major advance in precision oncology, yet their effectiveness depends critically on adequate target antigen expression. Tumour heterogeneity and dynamic antigen expression during treatment pose major challenges for conventional tissue biopsies used in patient selection. Liquid biopsy components such as circulating tumour cells (CTCs) enable real-time, minimally invasive monitoring of tumour burden, molecular characteristics and target antigen status. This review evaluates the potential of CTC analysis to overcome the key challenges in ADC therapy, including real-time target profiling, enhanced patient stratification and longitudinal monitoring of treatment response. While acknowledging that direct clinical evidence for CTC-guided ADC selection remains limited and prospective validation is still needed, we integrate clinical evidence from CTC-guided trials across different cancer types and propose pragmatic decision-making frameworks to incorporate CTC testing into ADC treatment strategies. We also examine how artificial intelligence (AI) has improved CTC detection accuracy and discuss exploratory AI models for multi-omics integration and hypothetical AI-guided ADC recommendation systems, clearly distinguishing these by their current level of clinical evidence. Liquid biopsy-guided ADC selection has the potential to enable more personalised cancer treatment as CTC technologies advance and standardisation improves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.