Observational studyFrontiers in immunology2026
Circadian disruption and circulating TGF-β1 in workers: evidence from Mendelian randomization and observational data.
Observational study in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Circadian disruption is increasingly recognized as an important biological stressor underlying chronic disease, yet its direct immunological effects remain unclear. Observational studies are limited by residual confounding and reverse causation. Methods: We integrated two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) with an exploratory observational biomarker study. Genetic instruments for genetically proxied shift-work propensity were derived from the UK Biobank GWAS, and outcome data for 46 circulating proteins were obtained from the AGES-Reykjavik Study in Iceland. Inverse-variance weighted (IVW) was primary estimator, with four additional MR estimators and sensitivity analyses assessed consistency and potential violations of MR assumptions. False discovery rate (FDR) correction was applied across the 46 primary IVW tests. We also measured eight circulating immune mediators among 61 Korean workers to obtain complementary observational evidence relevant to the MR findings. Results: MR demonstrated that genetic predisposition to shift work causally increases circulating TGF-β1 (β=1.15, 95% CI 0.28-2.02) and SMAD4 (β=1.12, 95% CI 0.20-2.05), with no evidence of heterogeneity, horizontal pleiotropy, or reverse causation. MR-PRESSO detected no outlier variants. In the observational analysis, shift workers exhibited higher serum TGF-β1, providing consistent supportive evidence, while pro-inflammatory cytokines measured in EDTA plasma showed no consistent differences. Conclusions: Circulating TGF-β1 emerged as a candidate immune signal associated with genetically proxied shift-work propensity. However, neither association survived FDR correction, SMAD2 and SMAD3 estimates were discordant, and the observational association attenuated after age adjustment. Further longitudinal studies are needed to clarify biological and mechanistic relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.