ReviewAmerican journal of cardiovascular disease2026
Effect of clinical telemonitoring on treatment adherence in patients with heart failure: protocol for a systematic review of clinical trials.
Review in American journal of cardiovascular disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of telemonitoring on clinical outcomes in adult patients with heart failure, with an emphasis on treatment adherence, mortality, and hospital readmission, through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
methodsThis is a systematic review protocol developed in accordance with the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and reported following the PRISMA-P guidelines. The protocol was registered on the PROSPERO platform (CRD420251181047). Randomized clinical trials evaluating telemonitoring interventions in adults with heart failure and reduced (HFrEF) or preserved (HFpEF) left ventricular ejection fraction will be included. Searches will be conducted in the MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases, without language or publication date restrictions. Two independent reviewers will perform study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the RoB 2.0 tool. The certainty of evidence will be assessed using the GRADE approach. When appropriate, data will be synthesized through meta-analysis using a random-effects model.
resultsThis systematic review is expected to compile and synthesize the best available evidence regarding the effectiveness of telemonitoring in patients with heart failure, identifying its impact on treatment adherence, mortality, and hospital readmission. It is also expected to identify which telemonitoring modalities and intervention components are associated with better clinical outcomes, as well as to highlight existing gaps in the scientific literature.
conclusionsThe findings of this review may provide robust evidence to support evidence-based clinical practice, inform decision-making in digital health, and guide the development and implementation of technologies aimed at cardiovascular care. Furthermore, this study is expected to contribute to the optimization of heart failure management and to the strengthening of more efficient and patient-centered models of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.