ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2026
Improving deep learning organ segmentation accuracy in cone-beam CT-guided radiotherapy using a robust scatter suppression method.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and purpose: Deep learning-based segmentation of organs and tumors in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is critical for improving workflow efficiency and accuracy in dose delivery monitoring and adaptive radiotherapy. However, degraded CBCT image quality, primarily due to scatter, can adversely affect segmentation performance. This study evaluated whether improving CBCT image quality through enhanced scatter mitigation improves deep learning (DL) segmentation accuracy. Materials and methods: A quantitative CBCT method incorporating a novel antiscatter grid and dedicated reconstruction pipeline was evaluated in a prospective study of 26 patients with cancers in the prostate, head and neck (H&N), and pelvis/abdomen regions. Each patient underwent both standard-of-care CBCT and quantitative CBCT scans. A foundation model, agnostic to CBCT images, was used to segment 13 organs and targets across CBCT and planning computed tomography (CT) images. DL segmentation accuracy was evaluated using Dice similarity coefficient and maximum Hausdorff distance with respect to clinician-drawn contours. Results: Mean Dice coefficients were higher for quantitative CBCT (0.66) compared to standard-of-care CBCT (0.61-0.63, Conclusions: Improved quantitative accuracy in CBCT through robust scatter suppression enhances deep learning-based segmentation, particularly for large organs, supporting its role in improving adaptive radiotherapy workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.