ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Tertiary lymphoid structures in neoadjuvant and perioperative cancer immunotherapy: a review and proposed framework for biomarker interpretation and validation.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) are associated with immunotherapy response and survival across solid tumors and are increasingly evaluated as tissue biomarkers. Neoadjuvant treatment provides pretreatment biopsies, on-treatment samples, and surgical resections, but these time points answer different clinical questions. Previous reviews have established TLS biology, maturation, and broad associations with response and survival. Here, we organize the evidence by sampling context, measurement object, and intended use. Pretreatment TLSs are candidate baseline stratification markers; within-patient changes describe pharmacodynamic remodeling only when specimens are comparable; and surgical TLSs describe post-treatment response phenotypes or postoperative prognosis according to the outcome time origin. These roles call for distinct validation designs. Immune cells, stromal organizers, and specialized vasculature can reshape TLSs, but parallel structural and tumor changes do not show that treatment benefit depends on TLSs. TLS-specific loss-and-rescue experiments are still needed to test that causal contribution. Clinical translation should therefore start with the decision being made and align the sample, measurement, missingness rules, and validation design to that decision. This framework explains part of the apparent inconsistency across studies and offers a practical path from descriptive associations to clinically interpretable evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.