ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026
Hierarchical prompting with reasoning large language models for immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis evidence extraction pilot study.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is an effective treatment for many cancers, but it can induce immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Among those, myocarditis is a severe complication associated with high morbidity and mortality. To support the rapidly emerging research, labour-intensive manual data extraction is often needed. Recent studies adopted large language models (LLMs) to systematically process clinical notes and identify patients with irAEs. However, research gaps persist: (i) For ICI-associated myocarditis, the applicability and scalability of LLMs have not been systematically evaluated; (ii) most existing studies focused on patient-level irAE detection while omitting the clinical nuances; and (iii) cutting-edge LLM techniques have not been adopted. Our aim was to evaluate an LLM approach to extract ICI-associated myocarditis evidence, including inflammatory infiltrate, life-threatening arrhythmias, heart failure, and stroke, from clinical notes. Methods and results: We collected clinical notes of patients with ICI-associated myocarditis at a single centre to develop and evaluate LLM-based methods that convert free-text clinical notes into structured data with entities (e.g. diagnosis, treatment, and imaging) and attributes (e.g. date, assertion, and status). We systematically evaluated three techniques: LLM reasoning, context engineering, and hierarchical prompting against ground truth created by a cardio-oncologist. Our proposed sentence-based context engineering and hierarchical prompting method, with a reasoning LLM, is significantly more accurate than the research trainees (F1 score of 0.6332 vs. 0.4933, Conclusion: We proposed an optimized method that integrates hierarchical prompting, context engineering, and a reasoning LLM for ICI-associated myocarditis evidence extraction to support physicians and researchers in rapid clinical data collection for research to make diagnostic and treatment inferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.