Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42787622›Full record

ArticleClinical parkinsonism & related disorders2026

Safety of opicapone in the elderly and very elderly population: an analysis of reported events in a global safety database.

Taku Hatano, Peter A LeWitt, Tetsuya Maeda, Javier Pagonabarraga Mora, Bruno F Dias, Helena C Brigas, Diogo Lopes, Helena Gama, Joerg Holenz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Taku HatanoDepartment of Neurology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Peter A LeWittWayne State University School of Medicine, Departments of Neurology and Pharmacology, Sastry Foundation Endowed Chair in Parkinson's Disease Research, Detroit, MI, USA.
Tetsuya MaedaDivision of Neurology and Gerontology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University, Iwate, Japan.
Javier Pagonabarraga MoraMovement Disorders Unit, Neurology, Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (Department of Medicine), Barcelona, CIBERNED, Spain.
Bruno F DiasBIAL - Portela & C, S.A., Coronado, Portugal.
Helena C BrigasBIAL - Portela & C, S.A., Coronado, Portugal.
Diogo LopesBIAL - Portela & C, S.A., Coronado, Portugal.
Helena GamaBIAL - Portela & C, S.A., Coronado, Portugal.
Joerg HolenzBIAL - Portela & C, S.A., Coronado, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Older people with Parkinson's disease (PD) are under-represented in clinical trials despite increasing disease burden and complexity. Although opicapone is approved as an adjunct to levodopa, data in elderly populations are limited. This study assessed its real-world safety in the elderly using post-marketing pharmacovigilance data. Methods: This retrospective analysis used the global opicapone safety database (data-lock: 31 Jan 2026). Valid case safety reports with opicapone as the suspected product were included and classified as elderly (≥65-84 years) or very elderly (≥85 years). Adverse events were analyzed descriptively by system organ class, preferred term, and seriousness. Non-standard use and treatment actions were also assessed. Results: Among 2914 analyzed cases (2558 elderly; 356 very elderly), 7195 adverse events were reported. Most reported events were non-serious (81.4% of events in elderly cases; 73.5% in very elderly cases). Dyskinesia was the most frequently reported event in both groups (7.1%-7.7% of events), followed by hallucination and visual hallucination (all <5% of events). Serious events accounted for a greater proportion of reported events in the very elderly versus elderly group (26.5% vs 18.6%), although no individual preferred term exceeded 5%. Non-standard use accounted for 6.0% and 3.5% of reported events in the very elderly and elderly groups, respectively, and included altered administration and off-label indications. Treatment was discontinued in approximately half of cases in both groups. Conclusion: Reported adverse event patterns were generally consistent with the established safety profile of opicapone across both age groups. No unexpected reporting patterns were observed; however, findings should be interpreted within the limitations of spontaneous pharmacovigilance data.

Indexed as

COMT-inhibitorLevodopaOpicaponeParkinson's diseaseSafety

Identifiers

PMID42787622
PMCPMC13602685

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.