ReviewJournal of cardiovascular echography
Artificial Intelligence and Echocardiography: From Literacy to Leadership, Redefining Roles, Responsibilities, and Sustainability in the Artificial Intelligence-driven Echocardiography Era.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular echography. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping echocardiography, evolving from experimental applications to regulated clinical tools that automate acquisition, quantification, and outcome prediction. Yet for many practitioners, AI terminology remains elusive and disconnected from routine care. This review provides an educational and conceptual framework to bridge technical innovation with clinical reasoning. We outline the foundations of AI literacy, covering machine learning, deep learning, dataset construction, and validation, while appraising the literature through contemporary methodological standards for cardiovascular imaging AI. We then describe four progressive levels of clinical value, from automation and standardization to disease phenotyping, prognostic modeling, and sustainability. Particular emphasis is placed on explainable AI, governance models, AI-ready laboratories, and the need for external validation and postdeployment accountability. Beyond efficiency, AI has ethical and societal implications: Cloud-based platforms and hub-and-spoke models may democratize access to high-quality echocardiography, supporting more equitable global care. Finally, we discuss evolving professional roles, educational frameworks, and the integration of generative and multimodal AI. The overarching goal is to guide clinicians from basic literacy to informed leadership in an era where echocardiography is increasingly AI-integrated rather than merely AI assisted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.