ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Leading through crisis: care home managers' COVID-19 experiences examined through systems-led setbacks and social positioning theory.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Care homes in England experienced disproportionate harm during the COVID-19 pandemic, yet existing policy analyses offer limited explanation of the structural and positional vulnerabilities faced by care home managers. This conceptual paper applies systems-led setbacks and social positioning theory to examine how pandemic policies shaped care home management across macro, meso and micro contexts. Methods: Qualitative research evidence relating to care home management during the pandemic was examined using a multi-level thematic analysis. Evidence was organised across six policy domains: hospital discharge, communication with families, personal protective equipment, end-of-life care, testing and surveillance, and vaccine roll-out. Recurring patterns were interpreted through the combined theoretical framework. Results: Five overarching themes were identified: liminal positioning, accountability displacement, rights erosion, information asymmetries and temporal misalignments. Across all six domains, managers were required to implement complex and frequently contradictory directives while operating with limited authority, incomplete information and insufficient institutional support. System-level decisions therefore interacted with managers' marginal organisational position, amplifying risk for both staff and residents. Conclusion: Systems-led setbacks and social positioning theory provide greater explanatory depth than conventional policy analysis by showing how structural inequities and positional vulnerabilities compounded pandemic harms. Future preparedness frameworks should explicitly recognise the authority, information needs and institutional position of care home leaders, and involve them directly in policy design and implementation to reduce avoidable harm to people living and working in care homes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.