Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42788060›Full record

ReviewRisk management and healthcare policy2026

Deep Learning for Early Prediction of Adverse Events in Intensive Care Units Using Electronic Health Records: A Methodological Review.

Kai Wang, Hui Yan, Dongsheng Chen, Xin Tan, Han Chen, Xudong Lu, Huilong Duan, Shan Nan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kai WangKey Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering of Hainan Province, School of Biomedical Engineering, Hainan University, Haikou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0004-6559-2585
Hui YanKey Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering of Hainan Province, School of Biomedical Engineering, Hainan University, Haikou, People's Republic of China.
Dongsheng ChenDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The 958th Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Xin TanCollege of Biomedical Engineering and Instrumental Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Han ChenDepartment of Information, Hainan Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Sanya, People's Republic of China.
Xudong LuCollege of Biomedical Engineering and Instrumental Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Huilong DuanCollege of Biomedical Engineering and Instrumental Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Shan NanKey Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering of Hainan Province, School of Biomedical Engineering, Hainan University, Haikou, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To provide a methodological synthesis of deep learning (DL) approaches for early prediction of preventable adverse events (AEs) in intensive care units (ICUs) using electronic health record (EHR) data, and to examine how intrinsic EHR data challenges affect model development, predictive performance, and clinical applicability. Methods: This review was designed as a methodological synthesis rather than a quantitative meta-analysis or statistical comparison. Seven databases were systematically searched to identify studies on early AE prediction in ICU settings using DL models. Eligible studies were screened based on predefined criteria, and data were extracted and synthesized qualitatively to analyze EHR data characteristics, DL architectures, and associated methodological challenges. Results: A total of 31 studies comprising 33 predictive models were included. These studies covered multiple preventable AEs, diverse ICU EHR datasets, and a range of DL architectures. Across studies with different prediction windows, reported AUROC values ranged from 0.75 to 0.95. Four studies used oversampling to address class imbalance. Despite the increasing use of advanced and hybrid architectures, three recurring methodological challenges remained: subtle early-stage risk signals, class imbalance, and heterogeneity. Overall, the effectiveness of DL-based AE prediction depends less on architectural novelty alone and more on whether models are explicitly designed around the data conditions under which preventable AEs emerge. Conclusion: Future studies should move beyond architecture-centered optimization and develop methodological strategies, such as multimodal learning, bias-aware modeling, and personalized prediction strategies. More attention should also be given to external and prospective validation, safe clinical use, and real-world effects on patient care and preventable harm.

Indexed as

adverse eventsdeep learningearly predictionelectronic health record dataintensive care unit

Identifiers

PMID42788060
PMCPMC13604016

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.