ReviewRisk management and healthcare policy2026
Deep Learning for Early Prediction of Adverse Events in Intensive Care Units Using Electronic Health Records: A Methodological Review.
Review in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To provide a methodological synthesis of deep learning (DL) approaches for early prediction of preventable adverse events (AEs) in intensive care units (ICUs) using electronic health record (EHR) data, and to examine how intrinsic EHR data challenges affect model development, predictive performance, and clinical applicability. Methods: This review was designed as a methodological synthesis rather than a quantitative meta-analysis or statistical comparison. Seven databases were systematically searched to identify studies on early AE prediction in ICU settings using DL models. Eligible studies were screened based on predefined criteria, and data were extracted and synthesized qualitatively to analyze EHR data characteristics, DL architectures, and associated methodological challenges. Results: A total of 31 studies comprising 33 predictive models were included. These studies covered multiple preventable AEs, diverse ICU EHR datasets, and a range of DL architectures. Across studies with different prediction windows, reported AUROC values ranged from 0.75 to 0.95. Four studies used oversampling to address class imbalance. Despite the increasing use of advanced and hybrid architectures, three recurring methodological challenges remained: subtle early-stage risk signals, class imbalance, and heterogeneity. Overall, the effectiveness of DL-based AE prediction depends less on architectural novelty alone and more on whether models are explicitly designed around the data conditions under which preventable AEs emerge. Conclusion: Future studies should move beyond architecture-centered optimization and develop methodological strategies, such as multimodal learning, bias-aware modeling, and personalized prediction strategies. More attention should also be given to external and prospective validation, safe clinical use, and real-world effects on patient care and preventable harm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.