SynthesisClinical cardiology2026
Antithrombotic Therapy in Coronary Artery Aneurysm, Ectasia, and Slow Flow: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Clinical cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCoronary artery aneurysm (CAA), coronary artery ectasia (CAE), and coronary slow flow phenomenon (CSFP) are coronary pathologies associated with altered hemodynamics and increased thrombotic risk. However, optimal antithrombotic management remains uncertain because of limited and heterogeneous evidence.
objectivesThis systematic review aimed to synthesize data on the efficacy and safety of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies in patients with CAA, CAE, and CSFP.
methodsFollowing PRISMA 2020 guidelines, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ProQuest were searched through September 2025 for randomized and observational studies evaluating antithrombotic therapy in adults with these conditions. Outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events and major bleeding. Narrative synthesis was conducted using the SWiM framework. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I and RoB 2.0, and certainty of evidence using GRADE.
resultsEleven studies comprising 3271 participants were included: six on CAE (n = 895), four on CAA (n = 2356), and one on CSFP (n = 20). In CAE, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and oral anticoagulation (OAC) were associated with fewer ischemic events than no therapy, although direct comparisons were inconsistent. The only randomized trial in CAE showed numerically lower recurrent myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death with single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) plus direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) versus DAPT, but findings were nonsignificant and based on few events. Evidence for CAA and CSFP remains limited and inconclusive.
conclusionsIntensified antithrombotic therapy may benefit patients with CAE, but evidence remains inconclusive for CAA and CSFP. Large, multicenter randomized trials are warranted to establish condition-specific treatment recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.