ReviewPharmacological reports : PR2026
Pharmacological targeting of ferroptosis in cancer: mechanisms, tumor immunity, and translational challenges.
Review in Pharmacological reports : PR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ferroptosis is an iron-dependent form of regulated cell death driven by phospholipid peroxidation and the failure of cellular antioxidant defenses. Its close integration with iron metabolism, lipid remodeling, and redox homeostasis has identified ferroptosis as a potentially exploitable vulnerability in cancer. This review critically examines the molecular and pharmacological determinants of ferroptotic sensitivity, including iron handling, acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 4 (ACSL4)/lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase 3 (LPCAT3)-dependent lipid remodeling, and the glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4)-glutathione, ferroptosis suppressor protein 1 (FSP1)-coenzyme Q10, mitochondrial dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH), and GTP cyclohydrolase 1 (GCH1)-tetrahydrobiopterin defense systems. We discuss experimental ferroptosis inducers and clinically used drugs with reported ferroptosis-modulating activity, emphasizing differences in their mechanisms, strength of evidence, and translational relevance. Particular attention is given to the bidirectional interactions between ferroptosis and the tumor immune microenvironment. Although cytotoxic lymphocytes and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) signaling may sensitize malignant cells to ferroptosis, excessive lipid peroxidation in cluster of differentiation 8-positive (CD8⁺) T cells, natural killer cells, dendritic cells, and other immune populations may impair antitumor immunity. These context- and cell-type-dependent effects support combination strategies involving immunotherapy, radiotherapy, and conventional or targeted anticancer treatments, but also define potential toxicities. We further discuss candidate biomarkers related to iron metabolism, lipid composition, antioxidant capacity, and immune context, as well as the need for patient stratification and targeted drug delivery. Successful clinical implementation will require selective induction of ferroptosis in malignant cells while preserving normal tissues and antitumor immune function. Ferroptosis should therefore be regarded as a conditional therapeutic vulnerability rather than a universally beneficial anticancer mechanism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42789241What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.