Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42789592›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Psychiatric polypharmacy in adult patients at the only referral psychiatric institute in Botswana: A cross-sectional study.

Boikhutso Changu Kinsman, Hlanganiso Roy, Anthony A Olashore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Boikhutso Changu KinsmanDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8255-5778
Hlanganiso RoyDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6974-8015
Anthony A OlashoreDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite growing acceptance in some clinical settings, its risks necessitate caution due to adverse effects, drug interactions, and poor adherence. We aimed to find the prevalence, patterns, and predictors of psychiatric polypharmacy among adults at Sbrana Psychiatric Hospital (SPH) in Lobatse, Botswana.

methodsThis cross-sectional study involved the collection of demographic and clinical data via interviews and medical records from 300 participants at SPH, which were subsequently analyzed using multivariable logistic regression.

resultsThe mean age of participants was 36.5 years (SD 12.1), and they were predominantly male (55.3%). The overall prevalence of psychiatric polypharmacy was 49.7%, with the most prevalent subtype being multi-class polypharmacy (79.2%). Inpatients (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] = 5.00; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 2.70,9.25), individuals with substance use disorder (AOR = 4.60; 95% CI: 1.18, 1.18,17.86), and those diagnosed with bipolar mood disorder (AOR = 2.67; 95% CI: 1.49,4.80) exhibited significant associations with psychiatric polypharmacy.

conclusionsPsychiatric polypharmacy is common in this group, mostly due to bipolar disorder or substance use disorders. It is crucial to identify high-risk patients for reviews and to train clinicians in rational prescribing to improve medication use and minimize risks in Botswana.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersPolypharmacyAdultBipolar DisorderBotswanaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospitals, PsychiatricHumansMaleMiddle AgedSubstance-Related DisordersYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42789592
PMCPMC13614637

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.