ArticlePloS one2026
Exploring the cytotoxic potential of Artemisia herba-alba crude extract and key phytoconstituents using in vitro assays and molecular docking insights.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the current research project is to evaluate the potential cytotoxicity of the aqueous extract of Artemisia -albaherba aerial parts against selected cancer cell lines. The widely grown plant material was collected and extracted. The crude aqueous extract was subjected to MTT analysis to assess potential cytotoxicity and cell viability. The cell lines utilized include: Normal Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial cell line EA (HUVEC; cat. no. CRL-1730; ATCC), Triple Negative Breast cancer cell line, MDA MB 231 (HTB-26), Human Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma cell line PANC1 (CRL-1469), Human Colorectal Carcinoma HCT 116 (CCL-247) cell lines. Cisplatin and doxorubicin serve as reference agents, and the media vehicle serves as a negative control. The extract was analysed by UHPLC/MS-MS. Three of the detected bioactive phytoconstituents, namely liquiritigenin, isofraxidin, and artemisinin, were docked against three cancer-associated protein targets corresponding to the three investigated cancer cell lines. The selected targets were TP53/p53 in the HCT-116 colorectal cancer cell line, AKT1 in the MDA cell line, and KRAS in the PANC-1 pancreatic cancer cell line. A marked decrease in cell viability was observed in the human colon and breast cancer cell lines at plant extract concentrations of 0.046-50 mg/mL. The highest cytotoxicity, around 45%, was observed against human colon cancer cells at concentrations of 12.5-50 mg/mL. And the cytotoxicity was around 40% against breast cancer cells at a concentration of 50 mg/mL. The plant remedy exhibited moderate cytotoxicity against pancreatic cancer cells, with an IC50 of approximately 20% at the highest tested concentration. The biocompatibility of the aqueous extract was predicted; hence, normal epithelial cells retained their viability at 1.5 mg/mL and showed a moderate-to-weak effect at higher concentrations. The herbal extract exhibits the highest IC50 values against EA and PANC1 of 220-240 µg/mL, whereas against MDA-MB-231 and HCT-116 cells, the IC50 values are significantly lower at 80-100 µg/mL. This indicates greater sensitivity of breast and colon cancer cell lines to the natural product. The simulation analyses demonstrate that isofraxidin and liquiritigenin have better binding affinity to the selected proteins than artemisinin. The best overall complexes were TP53-isofraxidin and TP53-liquiritigenin, with docking scores around -8 kcal/mol, followed by KRAS-liquiritigenin and AKT1-isofraxidin. To sum up, A. herb alba has a potential selective anticancer effect that may be attributed to the phenolic compounds constituents. These promising findings warrant further study to elucidate its mechanism of action, safety profile, and to predict the optimal dosage formulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.