Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42789677›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2026

A qualitative study to explore women's perceptions of pregnancy and antenatal care in Chizenga village, Chikwawa, Malawi.

Helen Layton, Deborah Nyirenda, Terry Kana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Helen LaytonFaculty of Education, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1499-9900
Deborah NyirendaCommunity Engagement and Bioethics Research Group, Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Terry KanaFaculty of Education, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

National survey data indicate that only around one quarter of women in Malawi attend their first antenatal care (ANC) visit during the first trimester. This study explores women's perceptions of ANC in Chizenga village, Chikwawa, a rural setting with high maternal mortality and low ANC uptake. Using an interpretivist qualitative design, 14 pregnant women aged 18-44 years were recruited through purposive sampling. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in Chichewa, translated into English, and analysed using thematic analysis to identify patterns across the dataset and develop themes grounded in participants' accounts. Findings indicate that while women valued ANC and recognised its role in reducing maternal and neonatal mortality, most initiated care after the first trimester. Key themes included understanding of pregnancy health and ANC, nutritional constraints despite awareness, gendered dynamics in ANC attendance, the perceived influence of witchcraft, experiences of respectful and disrespectful care, and structural barriers related to distance and transport. Socioeconomic constraints, particularly distance, transport costs, and limited health literacy, contributed to delayed ANC attendance. Nevertheless, women demonstrated resilience and a strong commitment to maternal health, with some walking over 22 kilometres to access services. Participants voiced a need for increased ANC education and proposed community-based solutions such as health worker outreach and improved access to services. The study calls for context-sensitive policy interventions, including community-based health education, outreach antenatal services, and improved transport support, to ensure equitable access to respectful antenatal care.

Identifiers

PMID42789677
PMCPMC13614636

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.