ArticleThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2026
Feasibility of immersive 40 Hz gamma sensory stimulation in early-stage Alzheimer's disease.
Article in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains in need of effective therapeutic strategies that are safe, scalable, and broadly accessible. Gamma sensory stimulation (GSS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation approach under investigation as a potential intervention for AD, supported by a favorable safety profile and emerging evidence of biological and clinical effects. This study evaluates the feasibility of delivering immersive GSS through virtual reality (VR) in individuals with early-stage AD. In this single-session, within-subject, sham-controlled early feasibility study, 11 participants with mild cognitive impairment due to AD or mild AD underwent immersive audiovisual stimulation delivered via VR while electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded. Participants engaged in three VR environments of increasing visual and cognitive complexity, in which audiovisual content was modulated at 40 Hz; two environments also included a sham condition. Primary outcomes were safety, tolerability, and 40 Hz neural responses. Secondary analyses compared neural responses and recall and recognition of encoded video-word pairs between 40 Hz and sham stimulation. All participants completed the session without serious adverse events or discontinuations. Stimulation-emergent symptoms were predominantly absent or mild. 40 Hz GSS elicited significantly stronger EEG responses at the stimulation frequency than both baseline and sham stimulation (p < 0.001), confirming target engagement. In exploratory analyses, items encoded during 40 Hz stimulation were better recalled and recognized than those encoded during sham stimulation (all FDR-adjusted p < 0.05). In this single-session study, immersive GSS was well tolerated and elicited frequency-specific 40 Hz EEG responses in individuals with early-stage AD, with no serious safety concerns identified, supporting the feasibility of this delivery approach. The encouraging acute neural and task-specific behavioral differences between 40 Hz and sham stimulation are hypothesis-generating and motivate controlled pilot studies evaluating the effects of repeated use on validated cognitive and functional outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.