ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
Clinical characteristics and prognostic outcomes of silent corticotroph versus gonadotroph adenomas: A 603-case single-center cohort study.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Silent corticotroph adenomas (SCAs) and silent gonadotroph adenomas (SGAs) are subtypes of non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs).However, studies comparing SCAs and SGAs are scarce, and their differences in clinical features, behavior, and prognosis are not well understood. This retrospective cohort study included 603 NFPA patients (188 SCAs, 415 SGAs) who underwent surgery at Beijing Tiantan Hospital between 2020 and 2025. Data were collected to compare features between groups, and Cox models identified predictors of postoperative radiological progression/recurrence. A nomogram was developed and evaluated using ROC, calibration, and decision curve analysis. SCAs were more common in younger women, while SGAs predominated in men. SCAs had larger tumor size (29.7 ± 10.8 mm vs. 27.9 ± 9.3 mm, P = 0.043), more cavernous sinus invasion (69% vs. 41%, P < 0.001), and more intratumoral hemorrhage (10.1% vs. 2.9%, P < 0.001) compared to SGAs, but a lower gross total resection rate (GTR) (86.7% vs. 92.5%, P = 0.022). Postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) was more frequent in SCAs (16% vs. 9.6%, P = 0.025). Multivariate Cox analysis identified distinct recurrence predictors: for SCAs, younger age, recurrent tumors, subtotal resection, and firm consistency increased recurrence risk; for SGAs, larger tumor size, subtotal resection, firm consistency, and Ki-67 ≥ 3% were predictive. The nomograms showed good apparent discrimination, and bootstrap internal validation demonstrated that both models retained good discriminative ability after correction for optimism. The AUCs for 2- and 4-year radiological progression/recurrence prediction were 0.934 and 0.914 for SCAs, and 0.898 and 0.882 for SGAs, respectively. Calibration and decision curve analyses suggested acceptable model performance within this cohort; however, external validation is required before clinical application. SCAs and SGAs differ in demographics, tumor behavior, and postoperative outcomes. SCAs are more invasive with lower GTR and higher VTE risk, while SGAs are firmer and more likely to cause pituitary dysfunction. The recurrence model supports individualized follow-up and early identification of high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42791427What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.