ReviewAnnals of medicine2026
Molecular histomorphometry and the emerging role of transcriptomics in celiac disease diagnosis and therapeutic trials.
Review in Annals of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCeliac disease (CeD) is an autoimmune enteropathy in which diagnosis and disease monitoring rely on serology and small-intestinal histology. However, conventional histological assessment is semi-quantitative, subject to interobserver variability, and relatively insensitive to subtle mucosal changes, particularly in treated patients or during early disease. Recent advances in transcriptomic technologies have enabled detailed characterization of intestinal mucosal gene expression, revealing disease-specific molecular signatures. This review aims to synthesize current evidence on molecular histomorphometry and to evaluate the emerging role of transcriptomic profiling in improving diagnosis, disease monitoring, and therapeutic trial endpoints in CeD. In addition, we propose practical guidelines and a methodological pipeline for implementing transcriptomic analyses in this context. DISCUSSION: Transcriptomic analyses consistently identify characteristic epithelial and immune activation signatures in active CeD, including interferon-driven pathways, epithelial stress responses, and loss of mature enterocyte differentiation. Importantly, persistent molecular abnormalities are often detectable in patients adhering to a gluten-free diet despite histological normalization, highlighting limitations of conventional endpoints. Molecular histomorphometry integrates gene expression data with morphologic features to provide continuous, quantitative measures of mucosal injury. Regression-based molecular indices demonstrate improved sensitivity, reproducibility, and dynamic range compared with traditional histology. In clinical trials, these approaches have potential to enable detection of treatment effects with smaller sample sizes and shorter study durations, and they have shown particular promise as endpoints in gluten challenge models and studies of therapies such as transglutaminase 2 inhibitors. We further outline a practical analytical pipeline, including study design considerations, data processing, model construction, and reporting standards.
conclusionsMolecular histomorphometry and transcriptomic profiling represent a significant advancement in the assessment of CeD, offering quantitative, qualitative and highly sensitive measures of mucosal pathology. Coupled with clear methodological guidance, these approaches have the potential to complement or, in selected contexts, surpass traditional histological evaluation in both clinical practice and drug development. Continued validation, harmonization, and standardization will be essential for broader implementation and regulatory acceptance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.