ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
End-to-End Intelligent Drug Discovery via a Scalable and Explainable Graph-Transformer Framework.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug discovery is still an expensive and time-consuming process where finding the right drug associations is important for therapeutic development. In this paper, a new system is proposed for drug design called PharmaGraphFormer (PGF). It consists of five stages: (i) Data acquisition and preprocessing (DAP), (ii) Feature extraction and feature fusion (FEF), (iii) Molecular representation (MR), (iv) Multi-task prediction, and (v) Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). This study employs a hybrid graph neural network (GNN)-transformer architecture that combines structural and sequence-based representations. Through DAP, several processes are executed, including the imputation or removal of missing values, outlier rejection, and class balancing. Next, through FEF1, features are extracted to represent the input data efficiently. Initially, compound-protein features are generated to document the interactions and relationships between chemical compounds and their corresponding target proteins. Secondly, drug characterizations are computed to encapsulate the physical, chemical, and structural attributes of each drug. After that, MR is performed using a graph-based molecule representation. Then, a novel model integrating GNNs and graph transformers, termed GNN-T, is proposed. Initially, GNNs represent the most promising deep learning models adept at processing non-Euclidean data. The Graph Transformer layer enhances atom representations by consolidating the representations of adjacent atoms through an attention mechanism. Finally, XAI is applied to explain the internal mechanisms of AI systems, rendering them comprehensible and interpretable. Across five independent runs, the proposed model achieved an accuracy of 0.963±0.002, a precision of 0.971±0.002, a recall of 0.958±0.003, an F1-score of 0.964±0.002, and a ROC-AUC of 0.993±0.001. These results demonstrate an outstanding performance when compared with all other models and emphasize that the proposed model is reliable in solving the problems of prioritizing compounds in line with the latest developments in AI-powered virtual screening and drug-target interaction modeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.